Discover Hertford Online Forum

Archived Topic

Topic ID 2838

04/06/2007 by Drama Queen

Witnessed 10.25 pm opp. Castle Hall

One of the "blinged" up vauxhall corsa's with the huge tail pipe exhausts, being driven by a 17 year old spotty baseball capped bloke and his mate, front seat, sitting outside of window which was wound down, so he's hanging out of the car as its being driven fast and attempting, as being driven past, to push the button of the pedestrian crossing opp. Castle hall!!!! whilst moving!!!!! He also had a can in his hand and it wasn't soda!!!! Couldn't believe my eyes... they carried on and tried to reach out to the stag monument!!!


0 replies

Archived Replies

Reply ID 40937

04/06/2007 by Leo Densian

No one around with a camera to record the event for posterity and posting on YouTube? Reaching out to the war memorial sounds a bit ambitious - unless it was Mr Tickle of course. Gobs**tes. [V]


Reply ID 40942

04/06/2007 by Ewoowar

I wouldn't fret too much. I expect this character either is already, or soon will be, quite 'armless.


Reply ID 40943

04/06/2007 by JohnSmith

Another candidate for the Darwin awards.


Reply ID 40977

05/06/2007 by Drama Queen

I only wished I had a camera.. I was in my own car at the time... Darwin Awards - yep I smell one soon


Reply ID 41113

08/06/2007 by steven

That same Corsa was out last night, screaming around outside the Duncombe. One complete idiot driving, another even bigger idiot with a can of beer, sitting on the windowsill hanging right out of the car. In hindsight I should have taken the registration and reported it. Only a matter of time, and if I see him injured/losing an arm/etc I _will_ laugh and point at him.


Reply ID 41119

08/06/2007 by Drama Queen

What I don't understand is if you or I behaved like that, putting other roadusers and pedestrians lives at risk of injury or death, the might of the law would lock me up for a long time... CCTV are all around these areas, what the hell are they doing??? Looking, watching and doing nothing. At the very least, the passenger isn't wearing a seatbelt!!! I have to be in Hertford all the next weekend to work at the Castle Hall for a drama production, Ihope that when I have to vacate the CH at the end of the night, these jokers aren't around... I don't mind fun, but this is taking the proverbial!


Reply ID 41137

08/06/2007 by lemonjelly

I think somebody probably did report these idiots to the police, as they were stopping some cars opposite the Lord Haig and giving the drivers breath tests last night at around 11 o'clock. Hope they caught them too...


Reply ID 41138

08/06/2007 by shaun

The Corsa does seem to be the idiots car of choice for some reason I do not know. If I find an arm lying around I will know where not to return it then [:)]


Reply ID 41250

11/06/2007 by thefair1973

I think small cars in gerneral are the idiot's car of choice, as they're cheaper to bling up, with exhaust pipes big enough to kick a football up and the fake GTI stickers and blacked out windows. God knows why they don't realise wthey look like utter fools


Reply ID 41262

11/06/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by thefair1973
I think small cars in gerneral are the idiot's car of choice, as they're cheaper to bling up, with exhaust pipes big enough to kick a football up and the fake GTI stickers and blacked out windows. God knows why they don't realise wthey look like utter fools
It also leads to car-stripping. Oiks buy low spec models of cars and then steal and install the interiors of higher spec models.


Reply ID 41321

11/06/2007 by Rachel

I see we've now moved away from the original topic (which was a specific instance of silly and dangerous behaviour by a car passenger) and into the comfortable off-topic territory of sneering at people we consider inferior to us, because we don't understand them. [V] Nothing new there, then. [|)] Ewoowar, didn't you in a rare moment of lucidity and tolerance, post on another thread, 'It is easy to deride...' ? Well, you should know! The target of your endless pomposity has moved from traffic wardens doing their job to people who buy low spec cars. This makes them 'oiks' does it? [:0][V] You, The Fair and Shaun seem happy to insult the (mainly) young adults who work hard to buy accesories for their pimped-up cars, and assume they are all thieves and idiots. [:(!] OK, we don't understand their culture and we think it looks tacky and foolish but so what? And of course there are people who own cheap cars who do act illegally (like the one DQ saw that started this thread) but many don't; you can rest assured that a young person in a baseball cap driving a banger worth a tenth of the value of its in-car sound-system gets pulled over and stopped far more than the drink-driving 50 year old in a Lexus [:(]. So please let's all try to be a bit less quick to start off-topic stereotyping and try to stick to the original topic, which was a specific instance of illegal behaviour witnessed locally. [:)]


Reply ID 41322

11/06/2007 by exiled_in_Reading

I would humbly submit there is a discernable positive correlation between individuals and their associates who drive food mixer powered chav chariots, and idiotic driving. Therein lies the link I think you are seeking.


Reply ID 41330

12/06/2007 by Admin

Before this gets personal and the flames start, I would advise that any comments you have be directed at "the floor" rather than individuals. Discussions are more productive when arguments are addressed instead of forum members.


Reply ID 41333

12/06/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by Admin
Before this gets personal and the flames start, I would advise that any comments you have be directed at "the floor" rather than individuals. Discussions are more productive when arguments are addressed instead of forum members.
Before it gets personal? How can it not be with a comment like..... "Ewoowar, didn't you in a rare moment of lucidity and tolerance, post on another thread, 'It is easy to deride...' ? Well, you should know! The target of your endless pomposity has moved from traffic wardens doing their job to people who buy low spec cars. This makes them 'oiks' does it?" Surely it is possible to disagree with someone without having to resort to such offensive language. I had posted a reply to that but removed it as I thought even the most reasoned and rational response might trigger another offensive and inflammatory personal post from the same source. On reflection, why should I not reply?


Reply ID 41338

12/06/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by Rachel
I see we've now moved away from the original topic (which was a specific instance of silly and dangerous behaviour by a car passenger) and into the comfortable off-topic territory of sneering at people we consider inferior to us, because we don't understand them. [V] Nothing new there, then. [|)] Ewoowar, didn't you in a rare moment of lucidity and tolerance, post on another thread, 'It is easy to deride...' ? Well, you should know! The target of your endless pomposity has moved from traffic wardens doing their job to people who buy low spec cars. This makes them 'oiks' does it? [:0][V] You, The Fair and Shaun seem happy to insult the (mainly) young adults who work hard to buy accesories for their pimped-up cars, and assume they are all thieves and idiots. [:(!] OK, we don't understand their culture and we think it looks tacky and foolish but so what? And of course there are people who own cheap cars who do act illegally (like the one DQ saw that started this thread) but many don't; you can rest assured that a young person in a baseball cap driving a banger worth a tenth of the value of its in-car sound-system gets pulled over and stopped far more than the drink-driving 50 year old in a Lexus [:(]. So please let's all try to be a bit less quick to start off-topic stereotyping and try to stick to the original topic, which was a specific instance of illegal behaviour witnessed locally. [:)]
Yes, I did post that it was 'easy to deride' on another thread. However it was completely unrelated to this topic and not aimed at an individual. For anybody bothered enough you can check the thread at the following link........ http://www.hertford.net/yoursay/topic.php?id=2825&whichpage=1 .....it has nothing to do with this thread so God knows why the personal response. My comment on that thread was towards those who deemed to deride an innocent attempt to promote an event in Hertford, not those who commit criminal or wreckless acts. The cause of my post in this thread was extremely relevant. It is relevant to those who have seen lads driving around in small hatchbacks. Most, in deed the vast majority are okay, but the small, no, tiny, tiny, minority are not. This can be anything from the feckwits accellerating along the access road to Hartham pool and doing handbrake turns in the pool car park to those who undertook the activity below.......... A neighbour with a Ford Ka 'high spec' model had her car written off. It's bonnet was ripped open with bolt cutters, the alarm was immobilised, the window smashed and the entire guts of the car stripped. This included everything, the seats, gear knob, glove compartment, parcel shelf, everything. It happened overnight in a residential street. The police said it would have been done to order.......locally. Admittedly my neighbours car could have been gutted by a team of octagenerians. But I doubt it. I might use the word 'oik' in my earlier post but it was not referring to all lads who drive small cars, just the mindless tiny minority. Given the events I think that's not unjustified. I used the word 'oik' in context, not to describe those who buy cars and spend their hard earned cash doing them up. I used it specifically to describe those at the other extreme, for which there is evidence of their behaviour. Why don't you come to my neighbours house and tell her why she should be more tolerant towards those that: 1) trashed her car 2) Increased her insurance costs 3) made her feel less safe in her home 4) stole personal items 5) have resulted in her buying a lower spec car to avoid the same happening again. I think you would find the term 'oik' one of the least offensive in her vocabulary. In addition, I question how tolerant any of us would be if this had happened to us or someone we know. I know I would have been just as livid. I can only assume you have misunderstood my post. Please read it again. I never said all those who buy low-spec cars are oiks. I never said that all those who buy low-spec cars are car-strippers. What I did say was that oiks buy low-spec cars.


Reply ID 41340

12/06/2007 by Dell Boy

I Don't want to get involved in this but I would like to point out that people can stereotype other people and give them or the establishment a very bad name is this what you are trying to say Rachel?[img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/fsc/hush.gif[/img]


Reply ID 41344

12/06/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by Dell Boy
I Don't want to get involved in this but I would like to point out that people can stereotype other people and give them or the establishment a very bad name is this what you are trying to say Rachel?[img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/fsc/hush.gif[/img]
The post of mine that seemed to trigger the response was.... "It also leads to car-stripping. Oiks buy low spec models of cars and then steal and install the interiors of higher spec models." I didn't say 'lads'. I tried to limit it to 'oiks'. For definition check the links below........... http://smilies.sofrayt.com/fsc/hush.gif[/img] http://smilies.sofrayt.com/fsc/hush.gif[/img] Having said that, perhaps I was stereotyping all oiks as car-strippers. Of course, most are not. Most oiks allow their oikishness to manifest in other forms of unpleasent behaviour and wouldn't dream of damaging a car. To those oiks I issue an apology should you have been offended by the inferrence that you may be inclined to strip cars.


Reply ID 41345

12/06/2007 by Dell Boy

I just wanted to know if Rachel feels offended by people being stereotyped.[img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/^/aiw/clever-man2.gif[/img]


Reply ID 41347

12/06/2007 by shunt

I think we need to take a good hard look at ourselves before we start identifying people's characteristics by the car they drive. That goes for the anti-4x4 lynchmob too.


Reply ID 41349

12/06/2007 by Dell Boy

Doesn't have to be the car people drive it could be where 1 likes to enjoy 1 self. ie. Shades Pool Hall. [img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/fsc/nono.gif[/img]


Reply ID 41353

12/06/2007 by Leo Densian

quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar The post of mine that seemed to trigger the response was.... "It also leads to car-stripping. Oiks buy low spec models of cars and then steal and install the interiors of higher spec models." I didn't say 'lads'. I tried to limit it to 'oiks'.
Can't see anything wrong with that post - It was informative actually as I was not particularly aware of that type of crime. And of course the 'oiks' will continue to pay insurance (assuming they do) at the rate for the base spec. model.


Reply ID 41355

12/06/2007 by Aelle

quote:
Originally posted by Dell Boy
Doesn't have to be the car people drive it could be where 1 likes to enjoy 1 self. ie. Shades Pool Hall. [img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/fsc/nono.gif[/img]
Blimey, I must be an oik then! I am a member of Shades and I drive a small hatchback, which is a bit of a banger. It has been the victim of minor vandalism on a number of occasions recently (smashed wing mirror, scratched paintwork, egged etc.), so by this and earlier definitions there must be some type of sub-oik, who doesn't drive a small hatchback, is maybe not a frequenter of pool clubs, but likes a bit of mindless vandalism.


Reply ID 41356

12/06/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by Dell Boy
I just wanted to know if Rachel feels offended by people being stereotyped.[img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/^/aiw/clever-man2.gif[/img]
Even if I had been guilty of stereotyping, is it really any worse than making personal and offensive comments. In the past I have amended posts and even removed my posts from entire threads in order to avoid offence. I wish others were as reflective. If people are unhappy about or disagree with something there are surely ways to articulate it that are less vitriolic and more constructive than personal abuse.


Reply ID 41360

12/06/2007 by Ewoowar

Admin.......perhaps this thread should be locked, cleansed or removed. It's going nowhere fast.


Reply ID 41362

12/06/2007 by simcut

This topic needs to go back err, on topic.....


Reply ID 41378

12/06/2007 by Dell Boy

Rachel Full Member 324 Posts Posted - 07 Jan 2005 : 13:11:34 Show Profile As pjmck points out, Shades is a pool hall. Is it any good? Well, let’s see… it's frequented by school kids, ‘long term sick’, benefit fraudsters whiling away the hours, violent thugs and other assorted low life stopping off between the bookies and the pub. Smoking is compulsory throughout; it’s the law. Laughably, ‘Shades’ offers chess as one of the available games. If you visit, Joby, I’d be interested to know if you observe anyone making imaginative use of Queen’s Gambit in their defensive chess strategy in between rolling another fag and admiring their latest tattoo. Rachel Full Member 324 Posts Posted - 11 Jun 2007 : 22:02:35 Show Profile Reply with Quote I see we've now moved away from the original topic (which was a specific instance of silly and dangerous behaviour by a car passenger) and into the comfortable off-topic territory of sneering at people we consider inferior to us, because we don't understand them. Nothing new there, then. Ewoowar, didn't you in a rare moment of lucidity and tolerance, post on another thread, 'It is easy to deride...' ? Well, you should know! The target of your endless pomposity has moved from traffic wardens doing their job to people who buy low spec cars. This makes them 'oiks' does it? You, The Fair and Shaun seem happy to insult the (mainly) young adults who work hard to buy accesories for their pimped-up cars, and assume they are all thieves and idiots. OK, we don't understand their culture and we think it looks tacky and foolish but so what? And of course there are people who own cheap cars who do act illegally (like the one DQ saw that started this thread) but many don't; you can rest assured that a young person in a baseball cap driving a banger worth a tenth of the value of its in-car sound-system gets pulled over and stopped far more than the drink-driving 50 year old in a Lexus . So please let's all try to be a bit less quick to start off-topic stereotyping and try to stick to the original topic, which was a specific instance of illegal behaviour witnessed locally. Yes, I agree let's get back on topic and not stereotype every 1. [img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/fsc/looking%20around2.gif[/img]


Reply ID 41379

12/06/2007 by shunt

quote:
As pjmck points out, Shades is a pool hall. Is it any good? Well, let’s see… it's frequented by school kids, ‘long term sick’, benefit fraudsters whiling away the hours, violent thugs and other assorted low life stopping off between the bookies and the pub. Smoking is compulsory throughout; it’s the law. Laughably, ‘Shades’ offers chess as one of the available games. If you visit, Joby, I’d be interested to know if you observe anyone making imaginative use of Queen’s Gambit in their defensive chess strategy in between rolling another fag and admiring their latest tattoo.
[:0] Wow!


Reply ID 41380

12/06/2007 by Drama Queen

Blimey, I only saw a dodgy geezer hanging out of a car trying to hit things with his beer-can holding hand.. !


Reply ID 41388

12/06/2007 by azzza

quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
As pjmck points out, Shades is a pool hall. Is it any good? Well, let’s see… it's frequented by school kids, ‘long term sick’, benefit fraudsters whiling away the hours, violent thugs and other assorted low life stopping off between the bookies and the pub. Smoking is compulsory throughout; it’s the law. Laughably, ‘Shades’ offers chess as one of the available games. If you visit, Joby, I’d be interested to know if you observe anyone making imaginative use of Queen’s Gambit in their defensive chess strategy in between rolling another fag and admiring their latest tattoo.
[:0] Wow!
Tut tut Rachel.... and we wouldn't want to stereotype people who openly train fair dodge either would we [;)]


Reply ID 41391

12/06/2007 by Leo Densian

'Hoist by her own petard' is the expression I believe [:D]


Reply ID 41394

12/06/2007 by shunt

Anybody for the avoidance of starting threads with "Witnessed...."? they nearly always go this way.


Reply ID 41395

12/06/2007 by Rachel

Wow! I feel like a famous person! [8D] Having years-old comments quoted back at me! I'm flattered by all the diligent research that's gone on. I don't know another message board where people remember so much about me and considering I make most of it up, it's particularly amusing [:D][;)][}:)] I didn't realise this forum was such an important part of so many people's lives! [:p][:)] Maybe some of you should get a hobby? I recommend buying a low-spec car and blinging it up.


Reply ID 41399

12/06/2007 by Dell Boy

No research needed, I remember this thread very well as it was a topic of conversation when I was playing 1 of my hobbies. Please don't take offence Rachel and let's put this down the [img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/i0/wc.gif[/img] and get back to the topic [img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/i0/wc.gif[/img] no offence [img]http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/i0/wc.gif[/img]


33 replies