Discover Hertford Online Forum

Topic

Topic ID 4202

20/02/2009 by harold.chaplin

ESSENTIAL CONNECTIONS - Hertford's Eco Group

Do you all know about Green Drinks - monthly at the White Horse Castle Street? Environmental issues are discussed over a pint. Come and join us on Thursday March 19th !


Replies

Reply ID 60917

20/02/2009 by exiled_in_Reading

I can't think of anything worse personally.


Reply ID 60919

20/02/2009 by codek2

So what was discussed at the last meet then?


Reply ID 60920

20/02/2009 by Donostia

quote:
Originally posted by codek2
So what was discussed at the last meet then?
Crème de menthe


Reply ID 60928

20/02/2009 by exiled_in_Reading

If Ian Harvey knew the White Horse was being used for such nefarious, lefty purposes, I suspect he would be apoplectic...


Reply ID 60929

20/02/2009 by Frenchie

Now now be nice to the newboy please. Thanks for making us aware Harold, not sure there seems to be too many takers here so far...


Reply ID 60935

20/02/2009 by dennismoore

Unfortunately Harold, bringing up environmental issues on the Hertford Forum is a bit like trying to have a sensible discussion about global warming on an episode of 'Top Gear'. But don't despair! For every negative comment you receive there'll be an equal number of people who'll read yor post and be genuinely interested. How appropiate that you posted it in the 'About Hertford Online' section!


Reply ID 60937

20/02/2009 by Steve

I'm reminded of the comment in The Guardian's "Let's Move To" feature about Hertford: "The Mail is available by the shedload". The reaction of some to Harold's post suggests there may be some truth to it.


Reply ID 60938

20/02/2009 by codek2

I find some of these suggestions surprising - I always got the impression that middle class people ( of which hertford is no doubt in that area ) were one of the most keyed up groups of people when it comes to green issues. It doesnt help that the council is useless at recycling services though! For sure hertford has a thriving farmers market - and local food is about as green as it gets. (literally sometimes!)


Reply ID 60939

20/02/2009 by shunt

If your little group can unravel the green bunkum, I'm all for it. Under examination most green policies are exactly the opposite and driven by commercial lobbies (introduction of catalytic convertors, for example) seeking to exploit the Green Pound. The trouble is, too few question. Good luck to you Harold.


Reply ID 60940

20/02/2009 by exiled_in_Reading

quote:
Originally posted by codek2
I find some of these suggestions surprising - I always got the impression that middle class people ( of which hertford is no doubt in that area ) were one of the most keyed up groups of people when it comes to green issues. It doesnt help that the council is useless at recycling services though! For sure hertford has a thriving farmers market - and local food is about as green as it gets. (literally sometimes!)
Why the bloody hell would anyone want to meet up with strangers in a pub to discuss this?


Reply ID 60941

20/02/2009 by 2929paul

I cannot think of anything more stereotyped than sitting in a real ale pub chewing a pint of "Old Malty" whilst mulling over the latest environmental issues. Please don't say you're all beardies with woolly jumpers. Even though I embraced a greener way of living just over 12 months ago and try to encourage others to follow suit, I don't think I'll be joining you. Although if you could just explain a bit about what you talk about and who you are, it might help give people a reason to join you. Do you exchange ideas about how to improve your working environments, or how to get the message across at home? Or petitioning the council? Or are you discussing how to get away with vandalising all the SUVs that take the kids to Duncombe School?


Reply ID 60944

20/02/2009 by codek2

I've just had a thought. have we all just been trolled? Doh! Good one though!


Reply ID 60946

20/02/2009 by dennismoore

Where else but on the Hertford Forum could inviting people out for a drink to discuss the environment be described as 'trolling'?!!!


Reply ID 60948

20/02/2009 by exiled_in_Reading

quote:
Originally posted by dennismoore
Where else but on the Hertford Forum could inviting people out for a drink to discuss the environment be described as 'trolling'?!!!
I don't think it's trolling - I do think it's very sad though..


Reply ID 60957

20/02/2009 by Steve

I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.


Reply ID 60961

20/02/2009 by exiled_in_Reading

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
How do you know this? Do people email you and say "I was going to join but I decided not to because it seems that some people aren't braindead simpering yes men who adhere to the politically correct rubbish that is infiltrating the country, rather they are people that actually stand up and express their point of view, and this concerns me" ? It maybe that Harold is too busy struggling back from tescos on his bike loaded down with his lentils to reply to this thread but I think he is the only one that can say whether they feel "attacked" or not.


Reply ID 60963

20/02/2009 by Leo Densian

quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading It maybe that Harold is too busy struggling back from tescos on his bike loaded down with his lentils
And in another thread you reckon the bloke at the railway station is rude? [V]


Reply ID 60965

20/02/2009 by shunt

quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
How do you know this? Do people email you and say "I was going to join but I decided not to because it seems that some people aren't braindead simpering yes men who adhere to the politically correct rubbish that is infiltrating the country, rather they are people that actually stand up and express their point of view, and this concerns me" ? It maybe that Harold is too busy struggling back from tescos on his bike loaded down with his lentils to reply to this thread but I think he is the only one that can say whether they feel "attacked" or not.
Political correctness came to the fore in order to compensate for the loss of older values such as common courtesy and fair play in society. The extreme versions of it that you hear are pure inventions of right-wing press, designed to produce the reaction above.[V]. It's a phrase which describes kind and decent behaviour, nothing more.


Reply ID 60968

20/02/2009 by James007

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
Seconded.


Reply ID 60971

20/02/2009 by exiled_in_Reading

quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
How do you know this? Do people email you and say "I was going to join but I decided not to because it seems that some people aren't braindead simpering yes men who adhere to the politically correct rubbish that is infiltrating the country, rather they are people that actually stand up and express their point of view, and this concerns me" ? It maybe that Harold is too busy struggling back from tescos on his bike loaded down with his lentils to reply to this thread but I think he is the only one that can say whether they feel "attacked" or not.
Political correctness came to the fore in order to compensate for the loss of older values such as common courtesy and fair play in society. The extreme versions of it that you hear are pure inventions of right-wing press, designed to produce the reaction above.[V]. It's a phrase which describes kind and decent behaviour, nothing more.
What is your authority for this assertion?


Reply ID 60972

21/02/2009 by dennismoore

quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
How do you know this? Do people email you and say "I was going to join but I decided not to because it seems that some people aren't braindead simpering yes men who adhere to the politically correct rubbish that is infiltrating the country, rather they are people that actually stand up and express their point of view, and this concerns me" ? It maybe that Harold is too busy struggling back from tescos on his bike loaded down with his lentils to reply to this thread but I think he is the only one that can say whether they feel "attacked" or not.
Political correctness came to the fore in order to compensate for the loss of older values such as common courtesy and fair play in society. The extreme versions of it that you hear are pure inventions of right-wing press, designed to produce the reaction above.[V]. It's a phrase which describes kind and decent behaviour, nothing more.
Very well put Shunt. I too am fed up with the hysteria whipped up in the right-wing media about so called 'Political correctness' by those who seek to justify rudeness directed at minorities or those they disagree with. I was brought up to be courteous and polite in my dealings with other people. I admit to letting these values slip myself occasionlly, but to slag off a first time poster who's simply asking like minded people out for a drink, is to me arrogant and boorish behaviour. I suggest some of you go along to the White Horse on the 19th. You might just learn something.


Reply ID 60973

21/02/2009 by shunt

quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
How do you know this? Do people email you and say "I was going to join but I decided not to because it seems that some people aren't braindead simpering yes men who adhere to the politically correct rubbish that is infiltrating the country, rather they are people that actually stand up and express their point of view, and this concerns me" ? It maybe that Harold is too busy struggling back from tescos on his bike loaded down with his lentils to reply to this thread but I think he is the only one that can say whether they feel "attacked" or not.
Political correctness came to the fore in order to compensate for the loss of older values such as common courtesy and fair play in society. The extreme versions of it that you hear are pure inventions of right-wing press, designed to produce the reaction above.[V]. It's a phrase which describes kind and decent behaviour, nothing more.
What is your authority for this assertion?
You need authority to to consider any concept?


Reply ID 60974

21/02/2009 by Steve

quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
If Ian Harvey knew the White Horse was being used for such nefarious, lefty purposes, I suspect he would be apoplectic...
What is your authority for this assertion? Do you know his political views? Does he ban "lefties" from the pub, or just quietly rage whilst benefitting from their custom? What other topics of discussion might he get apoplectic about? Is being "Green" exclusively "Leftie"? Even The Daily Mail seem to be lending their name to the challenge of climate change ([url="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/adfeatures/article-1151023/British-Gas.html"]Save Money, Look After Our World[/url])


Reply ID 60979

21/02/2009 by Leo Densian

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
Quite so Steve. I would also make the point that Harold, the starter of the thread, is prepared to stand up and be counted by clearly identifying himself through his user name - rather than hiding behind a pseudonym like stranded_in_slough or Leo Densian or whatever so good for him. [:)]


Reply ID 60982

21/02/2009 by exiled_in_Reading

quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
Originally posted by exin_reiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
How do you know this? Do people email you and say "I was going to join but I decided not to because it seems that some people aren't braindead simpering yes men who adhere to the politically correct rubbish that is infiltrating the country, rather they are people that actually stand up and express their point of view, and this concerns me" ? It maybe that Harold is too busy struggling back from tescos on his bike loaded down with his lentils to reply to this thread but I think he is the only one that can say whether they feel "attacked" or not.
Political correctness came to the fore in order to compensate for the loss of older values such as common courtesy and fair play in society. The extreme versions of it that you hear are pure inventions of right-wing press, designed to produce the reaction above.[V]. It's a phrase which describes kind and decent behaviour, nothing more.
What is your authority for this assertion?
You need authority to to consider any concept?
Firstly, when you pontificate as often as you do, on as many different topics, whilst claiming to know the ins and outs of everything, yes, authority to support an assertion is welcome.


Reply ID 60987

21/02/2009 by shunt

quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
Originally posted by exin_reiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
How do you know this? Do people email you and say "I was going to join but I decided not to because it seems that some people aren't braindead simpering yes men who adhere to the politically correct rubbish that is infiltrating the country, rather they are people that actually stand up and express their point of view, and this concerns me" ? It maybe that Harold is too busy struggling back from tescos on his bike loaded down with his lentils to reply to this thread but I think he is the only one that can say whether they feel "attacked" or not.
Political correctness came to the fore in order to compensate for the loss of older values such as common courtesy and fair play in society. The extreme versions of it that you hear are pure inventions of right-wing press, designed to produce the reaction above.[V]. It's a phrase which describes kind and decent behaviour, nothing more.
What is your authority for this assertion?
You need authority to to consider any concept?
Firstly, when you pontificate as often as you do, on as many different topics, whilst claiming to know the ins and outs of everything, yes, authority to support an assertion is welcome.
My company specialises in the application and legal consequences of what is often referred to as PC, but is actually just ethics, within the field of corporate governance and broader company structure. Research of social and political issues and trends, and the sources which drive them are my principle function within that company.


Reply ID 60989

21/02/2009 by exiled_in_Reading

That's odd- it wasn't long ago when a topic involved debate over unemployment in the UK that your company was heavily involved in recruitment and you spoke from an "informed" viewpoint on that too. I've no doubt next week, and in the coming weeks, it will be involved in something else too which is the subject of debate and comment, on which you will also opine and claim to have a highly informed viewpoint.


Reply ID 60991

21/02/2009 by shunt

quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
That's odd- it wasn't long ago when a topic involved debate over unemployment in the UK that your company was heavily involved in recruitment and you spoke from an "informed" viewpoint on that too. I've no doubt next week, and in the coming weeks, it will be involved in something else too which is the subject of debate and comment, on which you will also opine and claim to have a highly informed viewpoint.
Indeed we are. Recruitment obviously falls within our remit and is part of what we do, though at a higher level than a recruitment agency operates.


Reply ID 61004

22/02/2009 by James007

quote:
Originally posted by Leo Densian
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
I think it's very sad that some people can't show a bit more respect for other peoples' views. Here we have a new member who's perfectly legitimate thread is met with discourtesy, hostility and even aggression. Unfortunately this sort of response deters some people from joining the forum and posting for fear they might get attacked in a similar fashion.
Quite so Steve. I would also make the point that Harold, the starter of the thread, is prepared to stand up and be counted by clearly identifying himself through his user name - rather than hiding behind a pseudonym like stranded_in_slough or Leo Densian or whatever so good for him. [:)]
Not a mix of Harold Lloyd and Charlie Chaplin then Leo? [;)]


Reply ID 61006

22/02/2009 by Leo Densian

quote:
Originally posted by James007 Not a mix of Harold Lloyd and Charlie Chaplin then Leo? [;)]
Err..no [url]http://www.hertford.net/yoursay/topic.php?id=2871[/url]


Reply ID 61007

22/02/2009 by Leo Densian

quote:
Originally posted by James007 Not a mix of Harold Lloyd and Charlie Chaplin then Leo? [;)]
Err..no [url]http://www.hertford.net/yoursay/topic.php?id=2871[/url]


Reply ID 61008

22/02/2009 by James007

Good luck to him I say and apologies for doubting you Leo.


Reply ID 61014

22/02/2009 by dennismoore

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
If Ian Harvey knew the White Horse was being used for such nefarious, lefty purposes, I suspect he would be apoplectic...
What is your authority for this assertion? Do you know his political views? Does he ban "lefties" from the pub, or just quietly rage whilst benefitting from their custom? What other topics of discussion might he get apoplectic about? Is being "Green" exclusively "Leftie"? Even The Daily Mail seem to be lending their name to the challenge of climate change ([url="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/adfeatures/article-1151023/British-Gas.html"]Save Money, Look After Our World[/url])
You're right, it's not a left versus right thing. Although as has been clearly illustrated on this thread many 'conservatives' are still resistant to environmental issues. For years such things were the preserve of the liberal-left and it's never easy to admit that they were right and you were wrong. (Just as many on the left found it so hard to admit they were wrong about Soviet Russia during the last century). I hope Harold Chaplin wasn't put off by the rude and hostile responses to his initial post and will contribute to the forum again. In response to Leo's post, I'm happy to say that my real name is Andrew Ingamells!


Reply ID 61015

22/02/2009 by Donostia

In response to Leo's post, I'm happy to say that my real name is Andrew Ingamells! [:0][:0] Show us your etchings . [8D]


Reply ID 61016

22/02/2009 by dennismoore

Blimey! We've obviously met!


Reply ID 61036

23/02/2009 by Michael

quote:
Originally posted by exiled_in_Reading
If Ian Harvey knew the White Horse was being used for such nefarious, lefty purposes, I suspect he would be apoplectic...
Interesting that someone would associate Green issues as 'Lefty'. Well, interesting but not surprising having read the whole thread.


36 replies