Discover Hertford Online Forum

Topic

Topic ID 7431

20/10/2013 by highwayman

Conversion of Sovereign House to flats

Planning application ref 3/13/1840/PO is in with E Herts DC for conversion to 63 flats. Documents here: http://online.eastherts.gov.uk/swiftlg/apas/run/WPHAPPDETAIL.DisplayUrl?theApnID=3/13/1840/PO&theTabNo=3&backURL=%3Ca%20href=wphappcriteria.display%3ESearch%20Criteria%3C/a%3E%20%3E%20%3Ca%20href=%27wphappsearchres.displayResultsURL?ResultID=1066393%26StartIndex=11%26SortOrder=APNID:asc%26DispResultsAs=wphappsresweek1%26BackURL=%3Ca%20href=wphappcriteria.display%3ESearch%20Criteria%3C/a%3E%27%3ESearch%20Results%3C/a%3E


Replies

Reply ID 96307

20/10/2013 by Steve

The planning application is just for change of use - hence the lack of any detailed documentation and the 'indicative' floorplans. In fact planning permission may not be required at all, but the developer is seeking clarification via this application.


Reply ID 96309

20/10/2013 by scarymary

more demand on West Street parking me thinks!!


Reply ID 96342

22/10/2013 by Earthmother

It will be approximately 18 months before building will start which is why they have employed a parking firm for the car park. They have 60 car park spaces for 63 units which they are planning. I doubt it will have any impact on West Street as Pimlico Court hasn't.


Reply ID 96343

22/10/2013 by GillP

Has it still got the bunker it?


Reply ID 96344

22/10/2013 by Earthmother

Yes, the plans show this will be turned into flats


Reply ID 96556

10/11/2013 by Steve

New plans submitted for demolition of Sovereign House and construction of 90 flats [url="http://online.eastherts.gov.uk/swiftlg/apas/run/WPHAPPDETAIL.DisplayUrl?theApnID=3/13/1967/FP"]3/13/1967/FP[/url] Looks better than what's there ATM IMHO


Reply ID 96557

10/11/2013 by codek2

couldn't be worse :) It does even appear to be lower overall height than what was there before on the artist's sketches


Reply ID 96558

10/11/2013 by Golden

Artist's sketches are often found to be lacking in perspective when it comes to building heights - locals are often found to be surprised once the buildings are finished! Also surprised to see Elbert's building still there - I'd have though this was an ideal opportunity to sell this on?


Reply ID 96560

10/11/2013 by codek2

i did wonder about that Golden, we'll see i guess! I am also surprised elberts remains. would have made more sense to have included that bit too


Reply ID 96561

10/11/2013 by Steve

quote:
Originally posted by codek2
i did wonder about that Golden, we'll see i guess! I am also surprised elberts remains. would have made more sense to have included that bit too
They don't own that part of the site. You may recall the previous owner went into receivership.


Reply ID 96564

10/11/2013 by codek2

sure; but given they went into receivership, wouldn't it therefore probably be pretty cheap and easy to get that part of the site? Maybe they tried and failed!


Reply ID 96565

10/11/2013 by Steve

quote:
Originally posted by codek2
Maybe they tried and failed!
Got it in one! (It's mentioned in the Planning Statement). Elbert's is still owned by Barclay's.


Reply ID 96566

10/11/2013 by codek2

ah right - good research there Steve. I saw that mass of links and all I had time to look at were the photos/artwork! (And they downloaded excruciatingly slowly!)


13 replies