Discover Hertford Online Forum

Archived Topic

Topic ID 782

07/07/2005 by sloopjohnb

Highways, toucans and cyclists

As promised in another thread I thought I’d explain a few things about transport policy in town, being as involved as I am. There has been some criticism of the Toucan Crossing for wasting huge amounts of taxpayers money. Funding for this came from Hertfordshire County Council’s Local Transport Plan Settlement, which is effectively grant funding from the Department of Transport. All spending from this source is subject to very strict monitoring and would not be allowed to be spent on frivolous or speculative projects. However a small portion of funding does come from Council Tax. Schemes such as the Toucan crossing have to go through long periods of discussion and public consultation. Locally this happens through the Hertford Transport Forum. To regress a little. Gasvoyne Way was built as a relief road not a bypass. It had its critics but the Toucan Crossing was seen as one way of redressing the balance by joining the two sides of town. I can remember asking why this was placed where it is rather than at Queens Road where there are greater numbers of schoolchildren. There had already been much work done by residents in West Street and Tanners Crescent and other areas about access to the town centre. Consultations such as these take place at the Hertford Transport Forum which meets roughly every two months and although chaired by a County Councillor is directed by Hertfordshire Highways who are the leading agency. The Forum is a fully representative body of all interested groups in Hertford such as churches, residents associations, disabled groups, cyclists, councillors, Civic Society, HTCMB and others. In particular the discussion on the toucan crossing argued many of the points raised here – the role of the underpasses, crime in (actual of otherwise), signal delays, speeding, pedestrian safety and signage. Perhaps there is a problem with the work of the Forum not being publicised enough and the impression is given that much of the work that goes on in our highways is done without any public consultation at all. At the moment the forum is considering the Parliament Square entrance to Fore Street, Maidenhead Street, Sele Farm and new cycle routes proposed by cycling groups in Hertford. All these discussions move backwards and forwards from groups to their own organisations and back through Highways. It is a long process. Meetings of the Forum are often protracted but has to remain representative otherwise we end up with a public bunfight. No one organisation always gets its own way but that’s democracy


0 replies

Archived Replies

Reply ID 8545

11/07/2005 by Dude

Are you saying that it was not built in the centre (ie, queens road) simply because of local pressure? Surely the council should look at the majority, not the complaining few? The council quotes in the mercury tried to sell it as a safety thing. It should be safety for all, not just those that live in "private owned, tax payer funded" West Street?


Reply ID 8566

11/07/2005 by sloopjohnb

I think that by the time i suggested Queens road the die had been cast. The toucan crossing was in place in a response to two, possibly three things. One, that there was a real desire to join the town; two, that it is national government policy to encourage cycling and all things green so that this was perceived as the safest place to site a crossing that could be a) used by pedestrians b) cyclists and third, dovetailed with the National Cycle Route policy. Basically the last two fitted together in rsponse to what you can get Government funding for. When you consider the proximity of Queens Road to the Iceland roundabout I believe the vote went to West Street. I believe some, no, much work had been done by residents of West Street who also petitioned residents in Tanners Close(?) and other estates for a safe place to cross with children, prams etc. given tnat there is a very real or very real perceived view of violence and anti social activity in the underpasses. The response was apparently quite high and in favour of the crossing here ('well, it would be wouldn't it' said Mandy Rice Krispie).


2 replies